Insight 4
When voice AI represents the business, brand harm becomes the biggest perceived risk
The risks surrounding AI adoption are often framed in terms of security, privacy, governance, and accuracy. But among leaders who raised concerns about agentic voice AI implementation, potential harm to the brand or customer relationships emerged as the primary risk.
Top AI concern: Harm to brand or customers
Of the 350 leaders whose concerns were analyzed:
Potential harm to brand or customers
Potential harm to brand or customers
Potential harm to brand or customers
Key takeaway: 59% point to potential harm to their brand or customers, well ahead of privacy and governance (24%) and accuracy and reliability (17%).
For voice AI, the concern extends beyond whether an agent completes a task correctly. When an agent speaks directly with a customer, it is also representing the business in that interaction. How it communicates, responds to difficult situations, and handles the customer experience becomes part of how the company itself is represented.
That changes what businesses need to evaluate. Accuracy and resolution rates still matter, but they do not tell the whole story. Leaders describe combining quantitative performance data, such as accuracy, resolution rates, and customer feedback, with human judgment about how well the agent handled the interaction. The systems themselves can also generate insights about where agents reach their limits, creating another layer of information businesses can use to evaluate performance.
Think about what you'd expect from a great human employee handling your most sensitivecustomer calls: judgment, restraint, the ability to represent your company the way you'd want tobe represented when you're not in the room. That's the actual bar for agentic voice AI incustomer-facing moments. Not "did it answer correctly," but "did it sound like us."
Tim Sanders Chief Innovation Officer, G2
Agent autonomy shifts with complexity, stakes, and context
Human involvement is concentrated around interactions that businesses consider harder tostandardize. Complexity, uncertainty, and predefined triggers are the most common reasonsfor escalation, while nearly a third of leaders involve humans earlier when conversationsbecome high-stakes, emotional, or require greater judgment.
Industry boundaries shape how much autonomy voice AI agents are given. Voice AI agents inhealthcare handle about 63% of assigned tasks without human intervention, compared to 71% across other industries, with healthcare leaders placing greater emphasis on governance,privacy, and compliance requirements such as HIPAA.
Accuracy alone doesn't tell businesses how well voice AI is performing
Key findings
Businesses combine performance metrics with human judgment: Leaders evaluatequantitative measures such as accuracy, resolution rates, and customer feedback alongsidehuman judgment about how the agent handled the interaction. That broader evaluation helpsbusinesses assess not only whether the agent completed the task, but how effectively itrepresented the company while doing so.
Agents generate data about their own limitations: Handoff triggers also create a performance record. Each time an agent recognizes that it cannot resolve an issue and escalates, that interaction is logged, giving businesses additional.
RingCentral, the RingCentral logo, and all trademarks identified by the ® or ™ symbol are registered trademarks of RingCentral, Inc. Other third-party marks and logos displayed in this document are the trademarks of their respective owners.
© 2026 RingCentral, Inc. All rights reserved.